« The Google EcoSystem In Words and Pictures | Main | VoIP Goes Stale at Tesco in the UK »

March 24, 2010

Comments

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

Petesalerno

I also do not understand the basis for either of these patents.

This is an obvious extension of 800 number service.

It does not meet patent requirements of a non obvious improvement of an existing technology nor completely unique idea.

Jeff B.

I really don't understand the basis for these patents, myself.

Is it really any different from having my GoogleVoice number in Charlotte, NC called locally, and then forwarded to my Gizmo5 account, or fwd to any of my CallCentric, InPhonex, voip.ms DID's. Or, then have Gizmo5 forward the GV call to my iNum, or VoIP SIP address which I pickup on my ATA or softphone?

Are all these other VoIP services all of a sudden going to be sued for patent infringement because someone decided to patent these and related methods that have been used by others for a long time?

I agree there is a lot of fine line grey areas being patented in hopes of putting a strangle hold on the competition.

Jeff - CQVoIP
www.cqvoip.net

The comments to this entry are closed.

Blog powered by Typepad
My Photo

Andy In The News

November 2022

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
    1 2 3 4 5
6 7 8 9 10 11 12
13 14 15 16 17 18 19
20 21 22 23 24 25 26
27 28 29 30