Comments on Fax Over IP Has New LifeTypePad2010-02-03T13:29:43ZAndy Abramsonhttps://andyabramson.blogs.com/voipwatch/tag:typepad.com,2003:https://andyabramson.blogs.com/voipwatch/2010/02/fax-over-ip-has-new-life/comments/atom.xml/John Nicholson commented on 'Fax Over IP Has New Life'tag:typepad.com,2003:6a00d83451b99869e2012877732c68970c2010-02-07T21:54:58Z2010-06-11T04:12:50ZJohn Nicholsonhttp://profile.typepad.com/nicholsonjohnThis could be big in finally offering a secure easy to use faxing option for those of us with legacy...<p>This could be big in finally offering a secure easy to use faxing option for those of us with legacy clients that still live by the machines.</p>
<p><br />
Perk,</p>
<p>Sadly one of the main reasons fax is used is because of PCI/HIPPA compliance. Fax to email breaks this compliance and only makes things worse, and security is hard to enforce on both senders and receivers.</p>
<p>This system would handle the conversion of the PDF/JPG to the lower fax resolution at the local gateway which would reduce bandwidth vs. E-faxing where your sending a full size image over the internet then having the loss conversion take place.</p>
<p>As for the TCP encapsulation, SMTP already uses TCP for the same reason this system does its efficient at error checking.</p>Perk commented on 'Fax Over IP Has New Life'tag:typepad.com,2003:6a00d83451b99869e20120a85da464970b2010-02-04T04:45:17Z2010-06-11T04:03:31ZPerkhttp://profile.typepad.com/perk1A PDF or JPG via email really is the way to go here: Unified Archiving, simple to use. Fax over...<p>A PDF or JPG via email really is the way to go here: Unified Archiving, simple to use. Fax over VOIP to TCP = crazy inefficiencies . </p>
<p>Maybe I am the one that is crazy, in that case, bringing back Teletype by interfacing it to TCP-IP, and it could replace email and twitter.<br />
</p>