« Time For EcoSystem Support for Mobile VoIP | Main | Some Say My Touch is Tru (Truphone that is) »

December 03, 2008

Comments

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

Andy Abramson

Actually not. That's not correct.

In his analysis it appears that he missed the point about OnSip's "No Extension Pricing" by calculating the total sum based on the assumption of a charge of $39.95 PER extension plus usage. This is in error.

Reading that, this points that out http://www.onsip.com/faq

This is one of the differences between a flat rate bundle vs. a pay for service model.

Additionally, he loaded in two optional services into the calculation, auto attendant and conference bridge. Those are OPTIONS, so their inclusion in the price leads to a high price, when many users do not need those services. Those two additions add $478.xx to the bottom line that I don't incur as a PAYING customer.

FYI-I also revealed that Junction etworks is a client.

craig

Huh. Your statements seem to be untrue. I see Junction is a client of yours. Having trouble staying objective?

http://community.packet8.net/public_journal.php?m=c4ca4238a0b923820dcc509a6f75849b

The comments to this entry are closed.

Blog powered by Typepad
My Photo

Andy In The News

November 2022

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
    1 2 3 4 5
6 7 8 9 10 11 12
13 14 15 16 17 18 19
20 21 22 23 24 25 26
27 28 29 30