While I remain in the camp that innovation has to be allowed and supportive of Jeff Pulver position, I'm more disappointed that two of the more aggressive companies who are leading the revolution right now in the area of what I'm calling Voice 2.0 Skype and SipPhone were unavailable for comment and didn't present a viewpoint.
In defense of Skype, Kelly Larabee is off with her new baby and their new PR team should have given counsel to make sure some comment, even a holding statement saying "we respect the FCC's position and are currently looking at how to work within the framework while still maintaining our direction and course." For SipPhone, run by pal Michael Robertson who is a press hound I'm a bit perplexed and wonder how aggressively he was pursued before deadline, but again, with a carrier in the mix like Point One, that's where the PSTN side of the equation comes in, not at the SIP level, so Michael and company could have said something like, "we're working with our PSTN partners to figure out how to make this work, while still advancing SIP based communications."
The answers are too simple. In the case of Skype, their new layers of management (eBay-Skype-Staff), their distributed leadership (USA, UK, Sweden, etc.) has to be taxing them. This is one example of how the once nimble, asymmetrical and fast growth company has rapidly hit maturity under eBay. (Translation--they're not going to be as bold and brash without permission).