My Photo

Twitter Updates

    follow me on Twitter
    Blog powered by TypePad
    Member since 12/2003

    « Time For EcoSystem Support for Mobile VoIP | Main | Some Say My Touch is Tru (Truphone that is) »

    December 03, 2008

    When A Sale Isn't A Sale Price

    Earlier today I read what I call an ad disguised as a press release. The release was about a VoIP provider reducing prices under the guise of the small business bailout theme. What makes it not news is the price point isn't anything special. Better pricing exists. When Macy's lowers prices on mattresses and box springs they don't put out a press release. They buy an ad. That's what the company which is making the claim should be doing, not chasing the online media folks with thinly disguised words that connote what ad copy would say.

    What's got my dander up is that client Junction Networks has had both a better plan and a better price than this flag waving company for a very long time with their OnSip service, something TMC's Michael Dinan aptly covered last month in an interview with Robert Wolpov, Junction Networks' co-founder.

    When you compare the what the company who I'd rather not mention, against Junction Networks offerings, you'll see how the other guy's "sale" is not a big deal, nor as good. They started at a higher price, so now they're trying to catch up and still haven't.

    For me, that's what advertising is for. What Junction Networks did was called good PR. What they're offering is a better priced package and a far less complicated deal.

    Here are the details.

    Comments

    Actually not. That's not correct.

    In his analysis it appears that he missed the point about OnSip's "No Extension Pricing" by calculating the total sum based on the assumption of a charge of $39.95 PER extension plus usage. This is in error.

    Reading that, this points that out http://www.onsip.com/faq

    This is one of the differences between a flat rate bundle vs. a pay for service model.

    Additionally, he loaded in two optional services into the calculation, auto attendant and conference bridge. Those are OPTIONS, so their inclusion in the price leads to a high price, when many users do not need those services. Those two additions add $478.xx to the bottom line that I don't incur as a PAYING customer.

    FYI-I also revealed that Junction etworks is a client.

    Huh. Your statements seem to be untrue. I see Junction is a client of yours. Having trouble staying objective?

    http://community.packet8.net/public_journal.php?m=c4ca4238a0b923820dcc509a6f75849b

    Verify your Comment

    Previewing your Comment

    This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

    Working...
    Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
    Your comment has been saved. Comments are moderated and will not appear until approved by the author. Post another comment

    The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

    As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

    Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

    Working...

    Post a comment

    Comments are moderated, and will not appear until the author has approved them.


    Powered by Rollyo

    July 2009

    Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
          1 2 3 4
    5 6 7 8 9 10 11
    12 13 14 15 16 17 18
    19 20 21 22 23 24 25
    26 27 28 29 30 31  

    Find the best blogs at Blogs.com.