Om on IAX vs. SIP

Aswath on VoIP Forwarding Numbers

Aswath who regularly posts comments to the VoIPWatch blog and emails me from time to time has an interesting perspective and has done some fact finding out about the new Virtual numbers via VoIP that are popping up all over the place.

First, I don't think the market is as global as it is local and regional. In US markets like New York City, Phoenix, Los Angeles, San Diego, the Bay Area and just about anywhere there are multiple area codes the idea of being able to eliminate the local RBOC with VoIP is very appealing. If you think about the contractor trades (electricians, plumbers, carpet cleaners, roofers, carpenters, air conditioning repair, etc.) they all have 800 numbers or to appear more local than they are, numbers that are from each community they want to serve. Sure they're in the low tech world, but they've also been pioneers with pagers, cell phones, 2 way radios, Nextel.

If they add in VoIP with virtual numbering they cut their costs for numbers that they currently pay boatloads of money for, either for the 800 service or the mileage charge for an out of area number. VoIP also gives them the flexability to ring multiple numbers so imagine all the contractors out in the field getting the calls routed to the one on call that day after hours. Or imagine multiple "receptionists" being available during different day parts to field calls, all administered via the web browser, or even
better, preprogrammed in advance for which attendant is fielding the calls when.

There is a huge market for this type of thing, and the companies offering the Virtual numbers know it. Now they need to put the technology behind it, beyond simply allowing me to be called by dialing a number located somewhere else.


Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.


This is my understanding based on what is stated in http://www.vanderkraan.net/tjardick/archives/000051.html is the following: Suppose I get a virtual number in location A, that company is acting like a CLEC. So it gets access charges for all incoming calls (note that all calls incoming calls). If the call is terminated to a VoIP end-point via public internet, then the termination is free. If it is terminating in PSTN, the organiser seem to imply that the termination charge is same as the access charge received at location A. I am sure there are restriction as to where the virtual numbers are available and to which PSTN locations the call could be terminated.

If this understanding is correct then if the access charge regime changes to "bill and keep", then the business plan behind virtual number falls apart.


OK, help a newbie like me out here with this business model theory of ''you can OFFER a VIRTUAL NUMBER''' and receive money OFF of the ''terminating'''end also?????????
Sounds like the ""Level3 Biz MODEL""' that nobody has figured out as of yet........well, except ME!


Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been saved. Comments are moderated and will not appear until approved by the author. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.


Post a comment

Comments are moderated, and will not appear until the author has approved them.

Your Information

(Name is required. Email address will not be displayed with the comment.)